{"id":326,"date":"2018-03-29T15:48:02","date_gmt":"2018-03-29T13:48:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/christianos.eu\/?page_id=326"},"modified":"2018-10-11T12:05:40","modified_gmt":"2018-10-11T10:05:40","slug":"articles","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/articles\/","title":{"rendered":"News"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"wpb-content-wrapper\" id=\"wpb-content-root\"><p>[vc_row][vc_column]<style type=\"text\/css\" data-type=\"the7_shortcodes-inline-css\">.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d.dividers-on.classic-layout-list article {\n  margin-top: 10px;\n  padding-top: 0;\n  border-color: #d7d7d7;\n}\n.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d.dividers-on.classic-layout-list article:first-of-type {\n  margin-top: 0;\n  padding-top: 0;\n}\n.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d.classic-layout-list.mode-list .post-thumbnail-wrap {\n  width: 0%;\n}\n.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d.classic-layout-list.mode-list .post-entry-content {\n  width: calc(100% - 0%);\n}\n.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d.classic-layout-list.mode-list .no-img .post-entry-content {\n  width: 100%;\n}\n.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .filter-bg-decoration .filter-categories a.act {\n  color: #fff;\n}\n.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d:not(.mode-masonry) article {\n  margin-top: 10px;\n}\n.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d:not(.mode-masonry) article:first-of-type,\n.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d:not(.mode-masonry) article.visible.first:not(.product) {\n  margin-top: 0;\n}\n.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d.dividers-on:not(.mode-masonry) article {\n  margin-top: 0;\n  padding-top: 10px;\n}\n.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d.dividers-on:not(.mode-masonry) article:first-of-type,\n.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d.dividers-on:not(.mode-masonry) article.visible.first:not(.product) {\n  margin-top: 0;\n  padding-top: 0;\n}\n.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .post-thumbnail-wrap {\n  padding: 0px 0px 0px 0px;\n}\n.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d.enable-bg-rollover .post-thumbnail-rollover:after {\n  background: -webkit-linear-gradient();\n  background: linear-gradient();\n}\n.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .gallery-zoom-ico {\n  width: 44px;\n  height: 44px;\n  line-height: 44px;\n  border-radius: 100px;\n  margin: -22px 0 0 -22px;\n  border-width: 0px;\n  color: #ffffff;\n}\n.bottom-overlap-layout-list.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .gallery-zoom-ico {\n  margin-top: -22px;\n}\n.gradient-overlay-layout-list.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .gallery-zoom-ico,\n.content-rollover-layout-list.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .gallery-zoom-ico {\n  margin: 0 0 10px;\n}\n.content-align-center.gradient-overlay-layout-list.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .gallery-zoom-ico,\n.content-align-center.content-rollover-layout-list.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .gallery-zoom-ico {\n  margin: 0 auto 10px;\n}\n.dt-icon-bg-on.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .gallery-zoom-ico {\n  background: rgba(255,255,255,0.3);\n  box-shadow: none;\n}\n.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .gallery-zoom-ico > span,\n.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .gallery-zoom-ico:before {\n  font-size: 32px;\n  line-height: 44px;\n}\n.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .gallery-zoom-ico > span,\n.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .gallery-zoom-ico:before {\n  color: #ffffff;\n}\n.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .fancy-date a {\n  background: #ffffff;\n  box-shadow: none;\n}\n.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .fancy-date a * {\n  color: #2d2d2d;\n}\n.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .entry-title,\n.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d.owl-carousel .entry-title {\n  margin-bottom: 5px;\n  font-size: 18px;\n  line-height: 28px;\n  font-weight: bold;\n}\n.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .entry-meta {\n  margin-bottom: 15px;\n}\n.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .portfolio-categories {\n  margin-bottom: 15px;\n}\n.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .entry-excerpt {\n  margin-bottom: 5px;\n}\n.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d:not(.centered-layout-list) .post-entry-content {\n  padding: 5px 5px 15px 5px;\n}\n.blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d:not(.centered-layout-list):not(.content-bg-on):not(.mode-list) .no-img .post-entry-content {\n  padding: 0;\n}\n@media screen and (max-width: 768px) {\n  .blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d article {\n    -ms-flex-flow: column nowrap;\n    flex-flow: column nowrap;\n    margin-top: 20px;\n  }\n  .blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d.dividers-on article {\n    border: none;\n  }\n  .blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d.content-bg-on.centered-layout-list article {\n    padding: 0;\n  }\n  .blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d.blog-shortcode.dividers-on article,\n  .blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d.dividers-on.classic-layout-list article {\n    margin-top: 20px;\n    padding: 0;\n  }\n  .blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d.blog-shortcode.dividers-on article:first-of-type,\n  .blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d.dividers-on.classic-layout-list article:first-of-type {\n    padding: 0;\n  }\n  #page .blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .post-thumbnail-wrap,\n  #page .blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .post-entry-content {\n    width: 100%;\n    margin: 0;\n    top: 0;\n  }\n  #page .blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .post-thumbnail-wrap {\n    padding: 0;\n  }\n  #page .blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .post-entry-content:after {\n    display: none;\n  }\n  #page .blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .project-even .post-thumbnail-wrap,\n  #page .blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d.centered-layout-list .post-thumbnail-wrap {\n    -ms-flex-order: 0;\n    order: 0;\n  }\n  #page .blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d.centered-layout-list .post-entry-title-content {\n    -ms-flex-order: 1;\n    order: 1;\n    width: 100%;\n    padding: 20px 20px 0;\n  }\n  #page .blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d.centered-layout-list .post-entry-content {\n    -ms-flex-order: 2;\n    order: 2;\n    padding-top: 0;\n  }\n  #page .blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .fancy-categories {\n    top: 10px;\n    left: 10px;\n    bottom: auto;\n    right: auto;\n  }\n  #page .blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .fancy-date a {\n    top: 10px;\n    right: 10px;\n    left: auto;\n    bottom: auto;\n  }\n  #page .blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .post-entry-content {\n    padding: 20px;\n  }\n  #page .blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .entry-title {\n    margin: 3px 0 5px;\n    font-size: 20px;\n    font-size: 18px;\n    line-height: 26px;\n  }\n  #page .blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .entry-meta {\n    margin: 5px 0 5px;\n  }\n  #page .blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .entry-excerpt {\n    margin: 15px 0 0;\n  }\n  #page .blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .post-details {\n    margin: 5px 0 10px;\n  }\n  #page .blog-shortcode.blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d .post-details.details-type-link {\n    margin-bottom: 2px;\n  }\n}<\/style><div class=\"articles-list blog-shortcode mode-list blog-list-shortcode-id-359f721a833e7d27debe52cc9ba5500d classic-layout-list dividers-on jquery-filter scale-img dt-icon-bg-off loading-effect-fade-in\" data-cur-page=\"1\" data-post-limit=\"-1\" data-pagination-mode=\"none\"><article class=\"post project-odd visible no-img post-1711 type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-news category-4 description-off\" data-name=\"Judgement of the General Court in Joined Cases T-639\/14 RENV II, T-352\/15 RENV and T-740\/17 RENV: Dismissal of DEI\u2019s action for annulment against the Commission and \u201cMetlen Energy &#038; Metals SA\u201d\" data-date=\"2025-12-29T13:35:24+02:00\">\n\n<div class=\"post-entry-content\">\n\n\t<h3 class=\"entry-title\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2025\/12\/29\/judgement-of-the-general-court-in-joined-cases-t-639-14-renv-ii-t-352-15-renv-and-t-740-17-renv-dismissal-of-deis-action-for-annulment-against-the-commission-and-metlen-energy-me\/\" title=\"Judgement of the General Court in Joined Cases T-639\/14 RENV II, T-352\/15 RENV and T-740\/17 RENV: Dismissal of DEI\u2019s action for annulment against the Commission and \u201cMetlen Energy &#038; Metals SA\u201d\" rel=\"bookmark\">Judgement of the General Court in Joined Cases T-639\/14 RENV II, T-352\/15 RENV and T-740\/17 RENV: Dismissal of DEI\u2019s action for annulment against the Commission and \u201cMetlen Energy &#038; Metals SA\u201d<\/a>\n\t<\/h3>\n\n\t<div class=\"entry-meta\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2025\/12\/29\/\" title=\"13:35\" class=\"data-link\" rel=\"bookmark\"><time class=\"entry-date updated\" datetime=\"2025-12-29T13:35:24+02:00\">29\/12\/2025<\/time><\/a><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"entry-excerpt\"><p>Judgement of the General Court in Joined Cases T-639\/14 RENV II, T-352\/15 RENV and T-740\/17 RENV: Dismissal of DEI\u2019s action for annulment against the Commission and \u201cMetlen Energy &amp; Metals SA\u201d The General Court of the EU, in proceedings referred to it after a judgement on appeal delivered by the Court of Justice (CJEU) has&hellip;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2025\/12\/29\/judgement-of-the-general-court-in-joined-cases-t-639-14-renv-ii-t-352-15-renv-and-t-740-17-renv-dismissal-of-deis-action-for-annulment-against-the-commission-and-metlen-energy-me\/\" class=\"post-details details-type-link\" aria-label=\"Read more about Judgement of the General Court in Joined Cases T-639\/14 RENV II, T-352\/15 RENV and T-740\/17 RENV: Dismissal of DEI\u2019s action for annulment against the Commission and \u201cMetlen Energy &#038; Metals SA\u201d\">Read more<i class=\"dt-icon-the7-arrow-03\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><\/a>\n\n<\/div><\/article><article class=\"post project-odd visible no-img post-1700 type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-news category-4 description-off\" data-name=\"Judgment of the General Court of the EU in Case T 750\/22: Dismissal of the action for annulment against a decision of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA)\" data-date=\"2025-11-07T11:42:40+02:00\">\n\n<div class=\"post-entry-content\">\n\n\t<h3 class=\"entry-title\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2025\/11\/07\/judgment-of-the-general-court-of-the-eu-in-case-t-750-22-dismissal-of-the-action-for-annulment-against-a-decision-of-the-european-securities-and-markets-authority-esma\/\" title=\"Judgment of the General Court of the EU in Case T 750\/22: Dismissal of the action for annulment against a decision of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA)\" rel=\"bookmark\">Judgment of the General Court of the EU in Case T 750\/22: Dismissal of the action for annulment against a decision of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA)<\/a>\n\t<\/h3>\n\n\t<div class=\"entry-meta\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2025\/11\/07\/\" title=\"11:42\" class=\"data-link\" rel=\"bookmark\"><time class=\"entry-date updated\" datetime=\"2025-11-07T11:42:40+02:00\">07\/11\/2025<\/time><\/a><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"entry-excerpt\"><p>Judgment of the General Court of the EU in Case T\u2011750\/22: Dismissal of the action for annulment against a decision of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) Within the framework of a tendering procedure addressed to European undertakings, concerning the provision of information and communications technology consultancy services, the second tenderer lodged an action&hellip;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2025\/11\/07\/judgment-of-the-general-court-of-the-eu-in-case-t-750-22-dismissal-of-the-action-for-annulment-against-a-decision-of-the-european-securities-and-markets-authority-esma\/\" class=\"post-details details-type-link\" aria-label=\"Read more about Judgment of the General Court of the EU in Case T 750\/22: Dismissal of the action for annulment against a decision of the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA)\">Read more<i class=\"dt-icon-the7-arrow-03\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><\/a>\n\n<\/div><\/article><article class=\"post project-odd visible no-img post-1678 type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-news category-4 description-off\" data-name=\"Judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Case T 159\/20 RENV: Administrative decision adopted by an official who had a conflict of interests &#8211; Breach of the obligation of objective impartiality &#8211; Infringement of the right to good administration (Article 41(1) TFEU) &#8211; Liability of the E.U. Agency\" data-date=\"2025-05-21T10:57:39+02:00\">\n\n<div class=\"post-entry-content\">\n\n\t<h3 class=\"entry-title\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2025\/05\/21\/judgment-of-the-general-court-of-the-european-union-in-case-t-159-20-renv-administrative-decision-adopted-by-an-official-who-had-a-conflict-of-interests-breach-of-the-obligation-of-objective-impart\/\" title=\"Judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Case T 159\/20 RENV: Administrative decision adopted by an official who had a conflict of interests &#8211; Breach of the obligation of objective impartiality &#8211; Infringement of the right to good administration (Article 41(1) TFEU) &#8211; Liability of the E.U. Agency\" rel=\"bookmark\">Judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Case T 159\/20 RENV: Administrative decision adopted by an official who had a conflict of interests &#8211; Breach of the obligation of objective impartiality &#8211; Infringement of the right to good administration (Article 41(1) TFEU) &#8211; Liability of the E.U. Agency<\/a>\n\t<\/h3>\n\n\t<div class=\"entry-meta\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2025\/05\/21\/\" title=\"10:57\" class=\"data-link\" rel=\"bookmark\"><time class=\"entry-date updated\" datetime=\"2025-05-21T10:57:39+02:00\">21\/05\/2025<\/time><\/a><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"entry-excerpt\"><p>By this judgment, the General Court of the E.U., in a case referred back by the Court of Justice of the E.U. following an appeal, upheld an action brought by an official of an EU Agency and annulled a decision of the latter which had rejected the official\u2019s application for compensation of damage caused by&hellip;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2025\/05\/21\/judgment-of-the-general-court-of-the-european-union-in-case-t-159-20-renv-administrative-decision-adopted-by-an-official-who-had-a-conflict-of-interests-breach-of-the-obligation-of-objective-impart\/\" class=\"post-details details-type-link\" aria-label=\"Read more about Judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Case T 159\/20 RENV: Administrative decision adopted by an official who had a conflict of interests &#8211; Breach of the obligation of objective impartiality &#8211; Infringement of the right to good administration (Article 41(1) TFEU) &#8211; Liability of the E.U. Agency\">Read more<i class=\"dt-icon-the7-arrow-03\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><\/a>\n\n<\/div><\/article><article class=\"post project-odd visible no-img post-1665 type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-news category-4 description-off\" data-name=\"Decision of the complaints board of the European Schools: Appeal of a candidate against the decision on the failure to obtain the European Baccalaureate accepted\" data-date=\"2024-12-18T12:10:56+02:00\">\n\n<div class=\"post-entry-content\">\n\n\t<h3 class=\"entry-title\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2024\/12\/18\/decision-of-the-complaints-board-of-the-european-schools-appeal-of-a-candidate-against-the-decision-on-the-failure-to-obtain-the-european-baccalaureate-accepted\/\" title=\"Decision of the complaints board of the European Schools: Appeal of a candidate against the decision on the failure to obtain the European Baccalaureate accepted\" rel=\"bookmark\">Decision of the complaints board of the European Schools: Appeal of a candidate against the decision on the failure to obtain the European Baccalaureate accepted<\/a>\n\t<\/h3>\n\n\t<div class=\"entry-meta\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2024\/12\/18\/\" title=\"12:10\" class=\"data-link\" rel=\"bookmark\"><time class=\"entry-date updated\" datetime=\"2024-12-18T12:10:56+02:00\">18\/12\/2024<\/time><\/a><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"entry-excerpt\"><p>Our team successfully defended a disabled candidate before the Complaints Board of the European Schools, appealing the decision to deny the candidate the European Baccalaureat. In its decision of 7 March 2024, it was held that the European School in Brussels had failed to comply with the special measures which it had itself accepted during&hellip;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2024\/12\/18\/decision-of-the-complaints-board-of-the-european-schools-appeal-of-a-candidate-against-the-decision-on-the-failure-to-obtain-the-european-baccalaureate-accepted\/\" class=\"post-details details-type-link\" aria-label=\"Read more about Decision of the complaints board of the European Schools: Appeal of a candidate against the decision on the failure to obtain the European Baccalaureate accepted\">Read more<i class=\"dt-icon-the7-arrow-03\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><\/a>\n\n<\/div><\/article><article class=\"post project-odd visible no-img post-1640 type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-news category-4 description-off\" data-name=\"Judgment of the Court in Case C- 701\/21 P: The Court upheld appeal in case Mytilinaios v DEI\" data-date=\"2024-03-07T09:28:09+02:00\">\n\n<div class=\"post-entry-content\">\n\n\t<h3 class=\"entry-title\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2024\/03\/07\/judgment-of-the-court-in-case-c-701-21-p-the-court-upheld-appeal-in-case-mytilinaios-v-dei\/\" title=\"Judgment of the Court in Case C- 701\/21 P: The Court upheld appeal in case Mytilinaios v DEI\" rel=\"bookmark\">Judgment of the Court in Case C- 701\/21 P: The Court upheld appeal in case Mytilinaios v DEI<\/a>\n\t<\/h3>\n\n\t<div class=\"entry-meta\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2024\/03\/07\/\" title=\"09:28\" class=\"data-link\" rel=\"bookmark\"><time class=\"entry-date updated\" datetime=\"2024-03-07T09:28:09+02:00\">07\/03\/2024<\/time><\/a><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"entry-excerpt\"><p>By judgment C-701\/21 P delivered on 22 February 2024, the Court of Justice of the European Union annulled the judgment of the General Court in joined cases T- 639\/14 RENV, T-352\/15 and \u03a4-740\/17 and sent back the cases to the General Court for further appraisal. According to the Court, the General Court failed to ascertain&hellip;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2024\/03\/07\/judgment-of-the-court-in-case-c-701-21-p-the-court-upheld-appeal-in-case-mytilinaios-v-dei\/\" class=\"post-details details-type-link\" aria-label=\"Read more about Judgment of the Court in Case C- 701\/21 P: The Court upheld appeal in case Mytilinaios v DEI\">Read more<i class=\"dt-icon-the7-arrow-03\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><\/a>\n\n<\/div><\/article><article class=\"post project-odd visible no-img post-1627 type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-news category-4 description-off\" data-name=\"Judgment of the Court in Case C-111\/22P: The Court upheld appeal brought by a member of temporary staff against an agency of EU\" data-date=\"2024-01-18T10:36:01+02:00\">\n\n<div class=\"post-entry-content\">\n\n\t<h3 class=\"entry-title\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2024\/01\/18\/judgment-of-the-court-in-case-c-111-22p\/\" title=\"Judgment of the Court in Case C-111\/22P: The Court upheld appeal brought by a member of temporary staff against an agency of EU\" rel=\"bookmark\">Judgment of the Court in Case C-111\/22P: The Court upheld appeal brought by a member of temporary staff against an agency of EU<\/a>\n\t<\/h3>\n\n\t<div class=\"entry-meta\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2024\/01\/18\/\" title=\"10:36\" class=\"data-link\" rel=\"bookmark\"><time class=\"entry-date updated\" datetime=\"2024-01-18T10:36:01+02:00\">18\/01\/2024<\/time><\/a><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"entry-excerpt\"><p>By judgment C-111\/22 P delivered on 11 January 2024, the Court of Justice of the European Union held that the General Court by its judgement T- 159\/20 erred in law in interpreting the requirement of impartiality incumbent on the institutions and bodies of the Union under article 41(1) of the Charter. According to the Court,&hellip;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2024\/01\/18\/judgment-of-the-court-in-case-c-111-22p\/\" class=\"post-details details-type-link\" aria-label=\"Read more about Judgment of the Court in Case C-111\/22P: The Court upheld appeal brought by a member of temporary staff against an agency of EU\">Read more<i class=\"dt-icon-the7-arrow-03\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><\/a>\n\n<\/div><\/article><article class=\"post project-odd visible no-img post-1290 type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-news category-4 description-off\" data-name=\"Judgment of the Court in case C-280\/19P: Dismissal of the appeal brought by the European Research Council Executive Agency (ERCEA)\" data-date=\"2021-04-06T09:01:03+02:00\">\n\n<div class=\"post-entry-content\">\n\n\t<h3 class=\"entry-title\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2021\/04\/06\/judgment-of-the-court-in-case-c-280-19p-dismissal-of-the-appeal-brought-by-the-european-research-council-executive-agency-ercea\/\" title=\"Judgment of the Court in case C-280\/19P: Dismissal of the appeal brought by the European Research Council Executive Agency (ERCEA)\" rel=\"bookmark\">Judgment of the Court in case C-280\/19P: Dismissal of the appeal brought by the European Research Council Executive Agency (ERCEA)<\/a>\n\t<\/h3>\n\n\t<div class=\"entry-meta\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2021\/04\/06\/\" title=\"09:01\" class=\"data-link\" rel=\"bookmark\"><time class=\"entry-date updated\" datetime=\"2021-04-06T09:01:03+02:00\">06\/04\/2021<\/time><\/a><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"entry-excerpt\"><p>The court of Justice of the European Union by its judgment delivered on 14.01.2021 dismissed the appeal brought by the European Research Council Executive Agency (ERCEA) against the judgment T 348\/16 OP of the General Court of the EU. By the latter, the General Court of the EU partially upheld the action of Aristoteleio Panepistimio&hellip;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2021\/04\/06\/judgment-of-the-court-in-case-c-280-19p-dismissal-of-the-appeal-brought-by-the-european-research-council-executive-agency-ercea\/\" class=\"post-details details-type-link\" aria-label=\"Read more about Judgment of the Court in case C-280\/19P: Dismissal of the appeal brought by the European Research Council Executive Agency (ERCEA)\">Read more<i class=\"dt-icon-the7-arrow-03\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><\/a>\n\n<\/div><\/article><article class=\"post project-odd visible no-img post-167 type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-news category-4 description-off\" data-name=\"Judgment of the General Court in Case T-392\/15: Action for annulment of company European Dynamics etc. against the European Union Agency for Railways (EUAR)\" data-date=\"2017-10-13T13:24:45+02:00\">\n\n<div class=\"post-entry-content\">\n\n\t<h3 class=\"entry-title\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2017\/10\/13\/judgment-of-the-general-court-in-case-t-392-15-action-for-annulment-of-company-european-dynamics-etc-against-the-european-union-agency-for-railways-euar\/\" title=\"Judgment of the General Court in Case T-392\/15: Action for annulment of company European Dynamics etc. against the European Union Agency for Railways (EUAR)\" rel=\"bookmark\">Judgment of the General Court in Case T-392\/15: Action for annulment of company European Dynamics etc. against the European Union Agency for Railways (EUAR)<\/a>\n\t<\/h3>\n\n\t<div class=\"entry-meta\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2017\/10\/13\/\" title=\"13:24\" class=\"data-link\" rel=\"bookmark\"><time class=\"entry-date updated\" datetime=\"2017-10-13T13:24:45+02:00\">13\/10\/2017<\/time><\/a><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"entry-excerpt\"><p>The General Court of the EU, by its judgment published on 4 July 2017, dismissed the action for annulment submitted by European Dynamics etc. against EUAR. The European Union Agency for Railways case entrusted its defense to &#8220;Christianos and Partners Law Firm&#8221;.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2017\/10\/13\/judgment-of-the-general-court-in-case-t-392-15-action-for-annulment-of-company-european-dynamics-etc-against-the-european-union-agency-for-railways-euar\/\" class=\"post-details details-type-link\" aria-label=\"Read more about Judgment of the General Court in Case T-392\/15: Action for annulment of company European Dynamics etc. against the European Union Agency for Railways (EUAR)\">Read more<i class=\"dt-icon-the7-arrow-03\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><\/a>\n\n<\/div><\/article><article class=\"post project-odd visible no-img post-165 type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-news category-4 description-off\" data-name=\"Judgment of the General Court in Case T-270\/15: Action of company ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias against the Research Executive Agency (REA) successful\" data-date=\"2016-12-13T13:23:59+02:00\">\n\n<div class=\"post-entry-content\">\n\n\t<h3 class=\"entry-title\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2016\/12\/13\/judgment-of-the-general-court-in-case-t-270-15-action-of-company-anko-ae-antiprosopeion-emporiou-kai-viomichanias-against-the-research-executive-agency-rea-successful\/\" title=\"Judgment of the General Court in Case T-270\/15: Action of company ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias against the Research Executive Agency (REA) successful\" rel=\"bookmark\">Judgment of the General Court in Case T-270\/15: Action of company ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias against the Research Executive Agency (REA) successful<\/a>\n\t<\/h3>\n\n\t<div class=\"entry-meta\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2016\/12\/13\/\" title=\"13:23\" class=\"data-link\" rel=\"bookmark\"><time class=\"entry-date updated\" datetime=\"2016-12-13T13:23:59+02:00\">13\/12\/2016<\/time><\/a><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"entry-excerpt\"><p>The General Court of the EU, by its judgment published on 29 November 2016, upheld the action submitted by the company ANKO against the Research Executive Agency (REA). The defense of the case was entrusted to &#8220;Christianos and Partners Law Firm&#8221;. By its action lodged under Article 272 TFEU the company asked the Court to&hellip;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2016\/12\/13\/judgment-of-the-general-court-in-case-t-270-15-action-of-company-anko-ae-antiprosopeion-emporiou-kai-viomichanias-against-the-research-executive-agency-rea-successful\/\" class=\"post-details details-type-link\" aria-label=\"Read more about Judgment of the General Court in Case T-270\/15: Action of company ANKO AE Antiprosopeion, Emporiou kai Viomichanias against the Research Executive Agency (REA) successful\">Read more<i class=\"dt-icon-the7-arrow-03\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><\/a>\n\n<\/div><\/article><article class=\"post project-odd visible no-img post-161 type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-news category-4 description-off\" data-name=\"Judgment of the Court in Case C-78\/14 P: dismissal of the appeal brought by the European Commission\" data-date=\"2016-02-11T13:21:06+02:00\">\n\n<div class=\"post-entry-content\">\n\n\t<h3 class=\"entry-title\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2016\/02\/11\/judgment-of-the-court-in-case-c-78-14-p-dismissal-of-the-appeal-brought-by-the-european-commission\/\" title=\"Judgment of the Court in Case C-78\/14 P: dismissal of the appeal brought by the European Commission\" rel=\"bookmark\">Judgment of the Court in Case C-78\/14 P: dismissal of the appeal brought by the European Commission<\/a>\n\t<\/h3>\n\n\t<div class=\"entry-meta\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2016\/02\/11\/\" title=\"13:21\" class=\"data-link\" rel=\"bookmark\"><time class=\"entry-date updated\" datetime=\"2016-02-11T13:21:06+02:00\">11\/02\/2016<\/time><\/a><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"entry-excerpt\"><p>The Court of Justice of the European Union by its judgment delivered on 29\/10\/2015 dismissed the appeal brought by the European Commission against the judgment T-117\/12 of the General Court of the EU. By the latter, the General Court of the EU had upheld the action of ANKO under Article 272 of the T.F.E.U., seeking&hellip;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2016\/02\/11\/judgment-of-the-court-in-case-c-78-14-p-dismissal-of-the-appeal-brought-by-the-european-commission\/\" class=\"post-details details-type-link\" aria-label=\"Read more about Judgment of the Court in Case C-78\/14 P: dismissal of the appeal brought by the European Commission\">Read more<i class=\"dt-icon-the7-arrow-03\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><\/a>\n\n<\/div><\/article><article class=\"post project-odd visible no-img post-640 type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-news category-4 description-off\" data-name=\"Judgment of the General Court in Case T\u2011320\/09: Action for annulment of Planet AE Anonymi Etairia Parochis Simvouleftikon Ipiresion against the European Commission successful\" data-date=\"2015-05-12T15:02:44+02:00\">\n\n<div class=\"post-entry-content\">\n\n\t<h3 class=\"entry-title\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2015\/05\/12\/judgment-of-the-general-court-in-case-t%e2%80%91320-09-action-for-annulment-of-planet-ae-anonymi-etairia-parochis-simvouleftikon-ipiresion-against-the-european-commission-successful\/\" title=\"Judgment of the General Court in Case T\u2011320\/09: Action for annulment of Planet AE Anonymi Etairia Parochis Simvouleftikon Ipiresion against the European Commission successful\" rel=\"bookmark\">Judgment of the General Court in Case T\u2011320\/09: Action for annulment of Planet AE Anonymi Etairia Parochis Simvouleftikon Ipiresion against the European Commission successful<\/a>\n\t<\/h3>\n\n\t<div class=\"entry-meta\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2015\/05\/12\/\" title=\"15:02\" class=\"data-link\" rel=\"bookmark\"><time class=\"entry-date updated\" datetime=\"2015-05-12T15:02:44+02:00\">12\/05\/2015<\/time><\/a><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"entry-excerpt\"><p>The General Court of the EU, by its judgment published on 22 April 2015, upheld the action for annulment submitted by the company Planet AE against the European Commission. The defense of these two cases was entrusted to Christianos and Partners Law Firm. More specifically, in case T-320\/09 the company requested the General Court, to&hellip;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2015\/05\/12\/judgment-of-the-general-court-in-case-t%e2%80%91320-09-action-for-annulment-of-planet-ae-anonymi-etairia-parochis-simvouleftikon-ipiresion-against-the-european-commission-successful\/\" class=\"post-details details-type-link\" aria-label=\"Read more about Judgment of the General Court in Case T\u2011320\/09: Action for annulment of Planet AE Anonymi Etairia Parochis Simvouleftikon Ipiresion against the European Commission successful\">Read more<i class=\"dt-icon-the7-arrow-03\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><\/a>\n\n<\/div><\/article><article class=\"post project-odd visible no-img post-159 type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-news category-4 description-off\" data-name=\"Judgment of the General Court in Case T-165\/12: Action of companies European Dynamics Luxembourg SA and Evropa\u00efki Dynamiki \u2013 Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE against the European Commission\" data-date=\"2013-12-16T13:20:24+02:00\">\n\n<div class=\"post-entry-content\">\n\n\t<h3 class=\"entry-title\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2013\/12\/16\/judgment-of-the-general-court-in-case-t-165-12-action-of-companies-european-dynamics-luxembourg-sa-and-evropaiki-dynamiki-proigmena-systimata-tilepikoinonion-pliroforikis-kai-tilematikis-ae\/\" title=\"Judgment of the General Court in Case T-165\/12: Action of companies European Dynamics Luxembourg SA and Evropa\u00efki Dynamiki \u2013 Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE against the European Commission\" rel=\"bookmark\">Judgment of the General Court in Case T-165\/12: Action of companies European Dynamics Luxembourg SA and Evropa\u00efki Dynamiki \u2013 Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE against the European Commission<\/a>\n\t<\/h3>\n\n\t<div class=\"entry-meta\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2013\/12\/16\/\" title=\"13:20\" class=\"data-link\" rel=\"bookmark\"><time class=\"entry-date updated\" datetime=\"2013-12-16T13:20:24+02:00\">16\/12\/2013<\/time><\/a><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"entry-excerpt\"><p>The General Court of the EU, by its judgment published on 13 December 2013, accepted an action submitted by the companies European Dynamics Luxembourg SA and Evropa\u00efki Dynamiki \u2013 Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE against the European Commission. The defense of this case was entrusted to \u201cChristianos and Partners Law Firm\u201d. More specifically,&hellip;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2013\/12\/16\/judgment-of-the-general-court-in-case-t-165-12-action-of-companies-european-dynamics-luxembourg-sa-and-evropaiki-dynamiki-proigmena-systimata-tilepikoinonion-pliroforikis-kai-tilematikis-ae\/\" class=\"post-details details-type-link\" aria-label=\"Read more about Judgment of the General Court in Case T-165\/12: Action of companies European Dynamics Luxembourg SA and Evropa\u00efki Dynamiki \u2013 Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE against the European Commission\">Read more<i class=\"dt-icon-the7-arrow-03\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><\/a>\n\n<\/div><\/article><article class=\"post project-odd visible no-img post-157 type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-news category-4 description-off\" data-name=\"Judgment of the General Court in Cases T-117\/12 and T-118\/12: Actions of company ANCO SA against the European Commission successful\" data-date=\"2013-12-13T13:19:24+02:00\">\n\n<div class=\"post-entry-content\">\n\n\t<h3 class=\"entry-title\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2013\/12\/13\/judgment-of-the-general-court-in-cases-t-117-12-and-t-118-12-actions-of-company-anco-sa-against-the-european-commission-successful\/\" title=\"Judgment of the General Court in Cases T-117\/12 and T-118\/12: Actions of company ANCO SA against the European Commission successful\" rel=\"bookmark\">Judgment of the General Court in Cases T-117\/12 and T-118\/12: Actions of company ANCO SA against the European Commission successful<\/a>\n\t<\/h3>\n\n\t<div class=\"entry-meta\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2013\/12\/13\/\" title=\"13:19\" class=\"data-link\" rel=\"bookmark\"><time class=\"entry-date updated\" datetime=\"2013-12-13T13:19:24+02:00\">13\/12\/2013<\/time><\/a><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"entry-excerpt\"><p>The General Court of the EU, by two judgments published on 12 December 2013, held admissible two actions submitted by the company ANCO SA against the European Commission. The defense of these two cases was entrusted to Christianos and Partners Law Firm. More specifically, in cases T-117\/12 and T-118\/12, the company requested the General Court,&hellip;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2013\/12\/13\/judgment-of-the-general-court-in-cases-t-117-12-and-t-118-12-actions-of-company-anco-sa-against-the-european-commission-successful\/\" class=\"post-details details-type-link\" aria-label=\"Read more about Judgment of the General Court in Cases T-117\/12 and T-118\/12: Actions of company ANCO SA against the European Commission successful\">Read more<i class=\"dt-icon-the7-arrow-03\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><\/a>\n\n<\/div><\/article><article class=\"post project-odd visible no-img post-155 type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-news category-4 description-off\" data-name=\"Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights: Applicant awarded just satisfaction\" data-date=\"2013-12-11T12:54:05+02:00\">\n\n<div class=\"post-entry-content\">\n\n\t<h3 class=\"entry-title\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2013\/12\/11\/judgment-of-the-european-court-of-human-rights-applicant-awarded-just-satisfaction\/\" title=\"Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights: Applicant awarded just satisfaction\" rel=\"bookmark\">Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights: Applicant awarded just satisfaction<\/a>\n\t<\/h3>\n\n\t<div class=\"entry-meta\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2013\/12\/11\/\" title=\"12:54\" class=\"data-link\" rel=\"bookmark\"><time class=\"entry-date updated\" datetime=\"2013-12-11T12:54:05+02:00\">11\/12\/2013<\/time><\/a><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"entry-excerpt\"><p>On 5 December 2013, the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg delivered its judgment relating to the just satisfaction to be awarded to the applicant in case No 56759\/08. The applicant in that case was represented by Christianos and Partners Law Firm. With regard to the facts of the case, in 2009 the Greek&hellip;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2013\/12\/11\/judgment-of-the-european-court-of-human-rights-applicant-awarded-just-satisfaction\/\" class=\"post-details details-type-link\" aria-label=\"Read more about Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights: Applicant awarded just satisfaction\">Read more<i class=\"dt-icon-the7-arrow-03\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><\/a>\n\n<\/div><\/article><article class=\"post project-odd visible no-img post-642 type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-news category-4 description-off\" data-name=\"Judgment of the General Court in Case T-638\/11: Action of companies European Dynamics Luxembourg SA and Evropa\u00efki Dynamiki \u2013 Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE against the European Commission\" data-date=\"2013-10-17T15:03:46+02:00\">\n\n<div class=\"post-entry-content\">\n\n\t<h3 class=\"entry-title\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2013\/10\/17\/judgment-of-the-general-court-in-case-t-638-11-action-of-companies-european-dynamics-luxembourg-sa-and-evropaiki-dynamiki-proigmena-systimata-tilepikoinonion-pliroforikis-kai-tilematikis-ae\/\" title=\"Judgment of the General Court in Case T-638\/11: Action of companies European Dynamics Luxembourg SA and Evropa\u00efki Dynamiki \u2013 Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE against the European Commission\" rel=\"bookmark\">Judgment of the General Court in Case T-638\/11: Action of companies European Dynamics Luxembourg SA and Evropa\u00efki Dynamiki \u2013 Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE against the European Commission<\/a>\n\t<\/h3>\n\n\t<div class=\"entry-meta\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2013\/10\/17\/\" title=\"15:03\" class=\"data-link\" rel=\"bookmark\"><time class=\"entry-date updated\" datetime=\"2013-10-17T15:03:46+02:00\">17\/10\/2013<\/time><\/a><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"entry-excerpt\"><p>The General Court of the European Union, by its judgment published on 15 October 2013, accepted an action for annulment of EMA\u2019s decision, by which the tender of the applicants in the framework of the call for tenders EMA\/2011\/05\/DV was rejected. More specifically, the applicants put forward three pleas in support of their action for&hellip;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2013\/10\/17\/judgment-of-the-general-court-in-case-t-638-11-action-of-companies-european-dynamics-luxembourg-sa-and-evropaiki-dynamiki-proigmena-systimata-tilepikoinonion-pliroforikis-kai-tilematikis-ae\/\" class=\"post-details details-type-link\" aria-label=\"Read more about Judgment of the General Court in Case T-638\/11: Action of companies European Dynamics Luxembourg SA and Evropa\u00efki Dynamiki \u2013 Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE against the European Commission\">Read more<i class=\"dt-icon-the7-arrow-03\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><\/a>\n\n<\/div><\/article><article class=\"post project-odd visible no-img post-644 type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-news category-4 description-off\" data-name=\"Judgment of the General Court in Case C-314\/11 P: Dismissal of the European Commission\u2019s appeal\" data-date=\"2012-12-21T15:06:48+02:00\">\n\n<div class=\"post-entry-content\">\n\n\t<h3 class=\"entry-title\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2012\/12\/21\/judgment-of-the-general-court-in-case-c-314-11-p-dismissal-of-the-european-commissions-appeal\/\" title=\"Judgment of the General Court in Case C-314\/11 P: Dismissal of the European Commission\u2019s appeal\" rel=\"bookmark\">Judgment of the General Court in Case C-314\/11 P: Dismissal of the European Commission\u2019s appeal<\/a>\n\t<\/h3>\n\n\t<div class=\"entry-meta\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2012\/12\/21\/\" title=\"15:06\" class=\"data-link\" rel=\"bookmark\"><time class=\"entry-date updated\" datetime=\"2012-12-21T15:06:48+02:00\">21\/12\/2012<\/time><\/a><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"entry-excerpt\"><p>The Court of Justice, in its judgment published on December 19th, 2012, dismissed the European Commission\u2019s appeal against the order of the General Court in Case T-320\/09, by which that Court had dismissed the plea of inadmissibility raised by the Commission against an application lodged by Planet AE. Planet\u2019s application had sought annulment of the&hellip;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2012\/12\/21\/judgment-of-the-general-court-in-case-c-314-11-p-dismissal-of-the-european-commissions-appeal\/\" class=\"post-details details-type-link\" aria-label=\"Read more about Judgment of the General Court in Case C-314\/11 P: Dismissal of the European Commission\u2019s appeal\">Read more<i class=\"dt-icon-the7-arrow-03\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><\/a>\n\n<\/div><\/article><article class=\"post project-odd visible no-img post-153 type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-news category-4 description-off\" data-name=\"Judgment of the General Court in Case T-308\/10P: Dismissal of the European Commission\u2019s appeal\" data-date=\"2012-12-11T12:53:09+02:00\">\n\n<div class=\"post-entry-content\">\n\n\t<h3 class=\"entry-title\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2012\/12\/11\/judgment-of-the-general-court-in-case-t-308-10p-dismissal-of-the-european-commissions-appeal\/\" title=\"Judgment of the General Court in Case T-308\/10P: Dismissal of the European Commission\u2019s appeal\" rel=\"bookmark\">Judgment of the General Court in Case T-308\/10P: Dismissal of the European Commission\u2019s appeal<\/a>\n\t<\/h3>\n\n\t<div class=\"entry-meta\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2012\/12\/11\/\" title=\"12:53\" class=\"data-link\" rel=\"bookmark\"><time class=\"entry-date updated\" datetime=\"2012-12-11T12:53:09+02:00\">11\/12\/2012<\/time><\/a><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"entry-excerpt\"><p>The General Court, in its judgment published on July 12th 2012, dismissed the European Commission\u2019s appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union in Case F-30\/08, by which the Commission had been ordered to compensate an ex Eurostat senior official for the non-material damage he suffered due to his illegitimate&hellip;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2012\/12\/11\/judgment-of-the-general-court-in-case-t-308-10p-dismissal-of-the-european-commissions-appeal\/\" class=\"post-details details-type-link\" aria-label=\"Read more about Judgment of the General Court in Case T-308\/10P: Dismissal of the European Commission\u2019s appeal\">Read more<i class=\"dt-icon-the7-arrow-03\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><\/a>\n\n<\/div><\/article><article class=\"post project-odd visible no-img post-151 type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-news category-4 description-off\" data-name=\"Decision of the European Ombudsman regarding complaint against the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF)\" data-date=\"2012-12-10T12:51:21+02:00\">\n\n<div class=\"post-entry-content\">\n\n\t<h3 class=\"entry-title\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2012\/12\/10\/decision-of-the-european-ombudsman-regarding-complaint-against-the-european-anti-fraud-office-olaf\/\" title=\"Decision of the European Ombudsman regarding complaint against the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF)\" rel=\"bookmark\">Decision of the European Ombudsman regarding complaint against the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF)<\/a>\n\t<\/h3>\n\n\t<div class=\"entry-meta\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2012\/12\/10\/\" title=\"12:51\" class=\"data-link\" rel=\"bookmark\"><time class=\"entry-date updated\" datetime=\"2012-12-10T12:51:21+02:00\">10\/12\/2012<\/time><\/a><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"entry-excerpt\"><p>Christianos and Partners Law Firm represented one of the leading Greek consultancy companies in South East Europe which serves the public and private sector by delivering high value adding services, in a case before the European Ombudsman regarding irregularities committed on an on-the-spot check at the company\u2019s premises by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF). The&hellip;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2012\/12\/10\/decision-of-the-european-ombudsman-regarding-complaint-against-the-european-anti-fraud-office-olaf\/\" class=\"post-details details-type-link\" aria-label=\"Read more about Decision of the European Ombudsman regarding complaint against the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF)\">Read more<i class=\"dt-icon-the7-arrow-03\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><\/a>\n\n<\/div><\/article><article class=\"post project-odd visible no-img post-149 type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-news category-4 description-off\" data-name=\"Judgment of the Court in the case of Greek notaries, C-61\/08 Commission v. Hellenic Republic\" data-date=\"2011-08-01T12:50:45+02:00\">\n\n<div class=\"post-entry-content\">\n\n\t<h3 class=\"entry-title\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2011\/08\/01\/judgment-of-the-court-in-the-case-of-greek-notaries-c-61-08-commission-v-hellenic-republic\/\" title=\"Judgment of the Court in the case of Greek notaries, C-61\/08 Commission v. Hellenic Republic\" rel=\"bookmark\">Judgment of the Court in the case of Greek notaries, C-61\/08 Commission v. Hellenic Republic<\/a>\n\t<\/h3>\n\n\t<div class=\"entry-meta\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2011\/08\/01\/\" title=\"12:50\" class=\"data-link\" rel=\"bookmark\"><time class=\"entry-date updated\" datetime=\"2011-08-01T12:50:45+02:00\">01\/08\/2011<\/time><\/a><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"entry-excerpt\"><p>The Court of Justice of the European Union held in case C-61\/08 that, by imposing a nationality requirement for access to the profession of notary, the Hellenic Republic failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 TFEU, which ensures the freedom of establishment. On the other hand, the Court rejected the Commission\u2019s claim for a&hellip;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2011\/08\/01\/judgment-of-the-court-in-the-case-of-greek-notaries-c-61-08-commission-v-hellenic-republic\/\" class=\"post-details details-type-link\" aria-label=\"Read more about Judgment of the Court in the case of Greek notaries, C-61\/08 Commission v. Hellenic Republic\">Read more<i class=\"dt-icon-the7-arrow-03\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><\/a>\n\n<\/div><\/article><article class=\"post project-odd visible no-img post-147 type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-news category-4 description-off\" data-name=\"Refusal by the Greek courts to recognise a foreign adoption by a monk violates the ECHR\" data-date=\"2011-05-24T12:50:19+02:00\">\n\n<div class=\"post-entry-content\">\n\n\t<h3 class=\"entry-title\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2011\/05\/24\/refusal-by-the-greek-courts-to-recognise-a-foreign-adoption-by-a-monk-violates-the-echr\/\" title=\"Refusal by the Greek courts to recognise a foreign adoption by a monk violates the ECHR\" rel=\"bookmark\">Refusal by the Greek courts to recognise a foreign adoption by a monk violates the ECHR<\/a>\n\t<\/h3>\n\n\t<div class=\"entry-meta\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2011\/05\/24\/\" title=\"12:50\" class=\"data-link\" rel=\"bookmark\"><time class=\"entry-date updated\" datetime=\"2011-05-24T12:50:19+02:00\">24\/05\/2011<\/time><\/a><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"entry-excerpt\"><p>Christianos &amp; Partners Law Firm has successfully defended an application before the European Court of Human Rights (application no. 56759\/08), which has unanimously held on 3 May 2011 that the refusal by Greek courts to recognise an American order of adoption by a monk has amounted to a violation of the adopted child\u2019s fundamental rights.&hellip;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2011\/05\/24\/refusal-by-the-greek-courts-to-recognise-a-foreign-adoption-by-a-monk-violates-the-echr\/\" class=\"post-details details-type-link\" aria-label=\"Read more about Refusal by the Greek courts to recognise a foreign adoption by a monk violates the ECHR\">Read more<i class=\"dt-icon-the7-arrow-03\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><\/a>\n\n<\/div><\/article><article class=\"post project-odd visible no-img post-145 type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-news category-4 description-off\" data-name=\"Order of the General Court, Case T-320\/09, Planet v Commission\" data-date=\"2011-05-09T12:49:04+02:00\">\n\n<div class=\"post-entry-content\">\n\n\t<h3 class=\"entry-title\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2011\/05\/09\/order-of-the-general-court-case-t-320-09-planet-v-commission\/\" title=\"Order of the General Court, Case T-320\/09, Planet v Commission\" rel=\"bookmark\">Order of the General Court, Case T-320\/09, Planet v Commission<\/a>\n\t<\/h3>\n\n\t<div class=\"entry-meta\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2011\/05\/09\/\" title=\"12:49\" class=\"data-link\" rel=\"bookmark\"><time class=\"entry-date updated\" datetime=\"2011-05-09T12:49:04+02:00\">09\/05\/2011<\/time><\/a><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"entry-excerpt\"><p>The General Court in its order of 13 April 2011 declared inadmissible the plea of inadmissibility raised by the Commission against the action for annulment of PLANET against the European Anti-fraud Office (OLAF) decisions by virtue of which an Early Warning System (EWS) warning was requested and its flagging was activated. It was for the&hellip;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2011\/05\/09\/order-of-the-general-court-case-t-320-09-planet-v-commission\/\" class=\"post-details details-type-link\" aria-label=\"Read more about Order of the General Court, Case T-320\/09, Planet v Commission\">Read more<i class=\"dt-icon-the7-arrow-03\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><\/a>\n\n<\/div><\/article><article class=\"post project-odd visible no-img post-143 type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-news category-4 description-off\" data-name=\"The General Court annuls the Commission\u2019s decision relating to state aid to Olympic Airlines\" data-date=\"2010-09-27T12:48:09+02:00\">\n\n<div class=\"post-entry-content\">\n\n\t<h3 class=\"entry-title\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2010\/09\/27\/the-general-court-annuls-the-commissions-decision-relating-to-state-aid-to-olympic-airlines\/\" title=\"The General Court annuls the Commission\u2019s decision relating to state aid to Olympic Airlines\" rel=\"bookmark\">The General Court annuls the Commission\u2019s decision relating to state aid to Olympic Airlines<\/a>\n\t<\/h3>\n\n\t<div class=\"entry-meta\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2010\/09\/27\/\" title=\"12:48\" class=\"data-link\" rel=\"bookmark\"><time class=\"entry-date updated\" datetime=\"2010-09-27T12:48:09+02:00\">27\/09\/2010<\/time><\/a><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"entry-excerpt\"><p>In its judgment of 13.9.2010 in case T-416\/05, the General Court ruled on the appeal lodged by Olympic Airlines against the Commission&#8217;s decision C(2005)2706, concerning state aid amounting to 39,75 million euros, that had allegedly been granted to the above mentioned company. In particular, by its decision the Commission had found that the payment by&hellip;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2010\/09\/27\/the-general-court-annuls-the-commissions-decision-relating-to-state-aid-to-olympic-airlines\/\" class=\"post-details details-type-link\" aria-label=\"Read more about The General Court annuls the Commission\u2019s decision relating to state aid to Olympic Airlines\">Read more<i class=\"dt-icon-the7-arrow-03\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><\/a>\n\n<\/div><\/article><article class=\"post project-odd visible no-img post-141 type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-news category-4 description-off\" data-name=\"Olympic Airlines\u2019 action for annulment of European Commission decision on state aid\" data-date=\"2010-06-17T12:47:09+02:00\">\n\n<div class=\"post-entry-content\">\n\n\t<h3 class=\"entry-title\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2010\/06\/17\/olympic-airlines-action-for-annulment-of-european-commission-decision-on-state-aid\/\" title=\"Olympic Airlines\u2019 action for annulment of European Commission decision on state aid\" rel=\"bookmark\">Olympic Airlines\u2019 action for annulment of European Commission decision on state aid<\/a>\n\t<\/h3>\n\n\t<div class=\"entry-meta\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2010\/06\/17\/\" title=\"12:47\" class=\"data-link\" rel=\"bookmark\"><time class=\"entry-date updated\" datetime=\"2010-06-17T12:47:09+02:00\">17\/06\/2010<\/time><\/a><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"entry-excerpt\"><p>On 14 June 2010 the General Court of the European Union held an oral hearing in the case T-416\/05, concerning an action lodged by Olympic Airlines S.A. for annulment of the European Commission decision C (2005) 2706 on alleged state aid in favour of Olympic Airways. The Olympic Airlines S.A. was represented in the proceedings&hellip;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2010\/06\/17\/olympic-airlines-action-for-annulment-of-european-commission-decision-on-state-aid\/\" class=\"post-details details-type-link\" aria-label=\"Read more about Olympic Airlines\u2019 action for annulment of European Commission decision on state aid\">Read more<i class=\"dt-icon-the7-arrow-03\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><\/a>\n\n<\/div><\/article><article class=\"post project-odd visible no-img post-139 type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-news category-4 description-off\" data-name=\"Case F-30\/08: Compensation for non-material damage awarded to senior ex Eurostat official by the European Union Civil Service Tribuna\" data-date=\"2010-05-26T12:45:35+02:00\">\n\n<div class=\"post-entry-content\">\n\n\t<h3 class=\"entry-title\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2010\/05\/26\/case-f-30-08-compensation-for-non-material-damage-awarded-to-senior-ex-eurostat-official-by-the-european-union-civil-service-tribuna\/\" title=\"Case F-30\/08: Compensation for non-material damage awarded to senior ex Eurostat official by the European Union Civil Service Tribuna\" rel=\"bookmark\">Case F-30\/08: Compensation for non-material damage awarded to senior ex Eurostat official by the European Union Civil Service Tribuna<\/a>\n\t<\/h3>\n\n\t<div class=\"entry-meta\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2010\/05\/26\/\" title=\"12:45\" class=\"data-link\" rel=\"bookmark\"><time class=\"entry-date updated\" datetime=\"2010-05-26T12:45:35+02:00\">26\/05\/2010<\/time><\/a><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"entry-excerpt\"><p>On May 11, 2010 the European Union Civil Service Tribunal delivered its judgment in case F-30\/08, ordering the European Commission to compensate a senior ex Eurostat official for the non-material damage suffered by reason of his illegitimate implication in the Eurostat scandal, dating back in 2003. The defense of the case has been entrusted to&hellip;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2010\/05\/26\/case-f-30-08-compensation-for-non-material-damage-awarded-to-senior-ex-eurostat-official-by-the-european-union-civil-service-tribuna\/\" class=\"post-details details-type-link\" aria-label=\"Read more about Case F-30\/08: Compensation for non-material damage awarded to senior ex Eurostat official by the European Union Civil Service Tribuna\">Read more<i class=\"dt-icon-the7-arrow-03\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><\/a>\n\n<\/div><\/article><article class=\"post project-odd visible no-img post-137 type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-news category-4 description-off\" data-name=\"The Greek notarial profession before the Court of Justice of the EU\" data-date=\"2010-05-03T12:43:55+02:00\">\n\n<div class=\"post-entry-content\">\n\n\t<h3 class=\"entry-title\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2010\/05\/03\/the-greek-notarial-profession-before-the-court-of-justice-of-the-eu\/\" title=\"The Greek notarial profession before the Court of Justice of the EU\" rel=\"bookmark\">The Greek notarial profession before the Court of Justice of the EU<\/a>\n\t<\/h3>\n\n\t<div class=\"entry-meta\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2010\/05\/03\/\" title=\"12:43\" class=\"data-link\" rel=\"bookmark\"><time class=\"entry-date updated\" datetime=\"2010-05-03T12:43:55+02:00\">03\/05\/2010<\/time><\/a><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"entry-excerpt\"><p>On 27 April 2010 the Court of Justice of the European Union held an oral hearing in the case C-61\/08, European Commission v Hellenic Republic, dealing with the abolishment of the nationality requirement for the performance of notary functions in Greece. The procedure was complex, joining, along with the action against the Hellenic Republic, the&hellip;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2010\/05\/03\/the-greek-notarial-profession-before-the-court-of-justice-of-the-eu\/\" class=\"post-details details-type-link\" aria-label=\"Read more about The Greek notarial profession before the Court of Justice of the EU\">Read more<i class=\"dt-icon-the7-arrow-03\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><\/a>\n\n<\/div><\/article><article class=\"post project-odd visible no-img post-311 type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-news category-4 description-off\" data-name=\"Action against the special levy imposed on income: On 22.2.2010 the Ministry of Economy and Finance decided the refund of the special levy imposed on income to E.U. employees, as the particular provision was found apparently incompatible with EU law.\" data-date=\"2010-03-04T15:08:56+02:00\">\n\n<div class=\"post-entry-content\">\n\n\t<h3 class=\"entry-title\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2010\/03\/04\/action-against-the-special-levy-imposed-on-income-on-22-2-2010-the-ministry-of-economy-and-finance-decided-the-refund-of-the-special-levy-imposed-on-income-to-e-u-employees-as-the-particular-provis\/\" title=\"Action against the special levy imposed on income: On 22.2.2010 the Ministry of Economy and Finance decided the refund of the special levy imposed on income to E.U. employees, as the particular provision was found apparently incompatible with EU law.\" rel=\"bookmark\">Action against the special levy imposed on income: On 22.2.2010 the Ministry of Economy and Finance decided the refund of the special levy imposed on income to E.U. employees, as the particular provision was found apparently incompatible with EU law.<\/a>\n\t<\/h3>\n\n\t<div class=\"entry-meta\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2010\/03\/04\/\" title=\"15:08\" class=\"data-link\" rel=\"bookmark\"><time class=\"entry-date updated\" datetime=\"2010-03-04T15:08:56+02:00\">04\/03\/2010<\/time><\/a><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"entry-excerpt\"><p>After providing a legal expert opinion regarding the special levy imposed on income on request of the European Parliament, \u00abChristianos &amp; Partners\u00bb law firm assumed a series of cases brought before the national courts in opposition to the above-mentioned measure. With its relevant decision of the 22th February 2010, by which Ministry of Economy and&hellip;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2010\/03\/04\/action-against-the-special-levy-imposed-on-income-on-22-2-2010-the-ministry-of-economy-and-finance-decided-the-refund-of-the-special-levy-imposed-on-income-to-e-u-employees-as-the-particular-provis\/\" class=\"post-details details-type-link\" aria-label=\"Read more about Action against the special levy imposed on income: On 22.2.2010 the Ministry of Economy and Finance decided the refund of the special levy imposed on income to E.U. employees, as the particular provision was found apparently incompatible with EU law.\">Read more<i class=\"dt-icon-the7-arrow-03\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><\/a>\n\n<\/div><\/article><article class=\"post project-odd visible no-img post-135 type-post status-publish format-standard hentry category-news category-4 description-off\" data-name=\"&#8220;Christianos &#038; Partners&#8221; law firm defended the case F-30\/08 before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal\" data-date=\"2010-01-09T12:43:03+02:00\">\n\n<div class=\"post-entry-content\">\n\n\t<h3 class=\"entry-title\">\n\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2010\/01\/09\/christianos-partners-law-firm-defended-the-case-f-30-08-before-the-european-union-civil-service-tribunal\/\" title=\"&#8220;Christianos &#038; Partners&#8221; law firm defended the case F-30\/08 before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal\" rel=\"bookmark\">&#8220;Christianos &#038; Partners&#8221; law firm defended the case F-30\/08 before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal<\/a>\n\t<\/h3>\n\n\t<div class=\"entry-meta\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2010\/01\/09\/\" title=\"12:43\" class=\"data-link\" rel=\"bookmark\"><time class=\"entry-date updated\" datetime=\"2010-01-09T12:43:03+02:00\">09\/01\/2010<\/time><\/a><\/div>\n\t<div class=\"entry-excerpt\"><p>On 18.11.2009 a hearing was conducted before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal on the case F-30\/08, regarding the request of an individual to be compensated by the European Commission as a result of the damage suffered due to his illegitimate implication in the Eurostat scandal dating back to 2003. The judgment on the above&hellip;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n\t\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/2010\/01\/09\/christianos-partners-law-firm-defended-the-case-f-30-08-before-the-european-union-civil-service-tribunal\/\" class=\"post-details details-type-link\" aria-label=\"Read more about &#8220;Christianos &#038; Partners&#8221; law firm defended the case F-30\/08 before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal\">Read more<i class=\"dt-icon-the7-arrow-03\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><\/a>\n\n<\/div><\/article><\/div>[\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[vc_row][vc_column][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-326","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","description-off"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.5 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>News | Christianos &amp; Partners - Law Firm<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"News | Christianos &amp; Partners | Lawyer - EU Law - OLAF - Competition - State Aid - ECJ-ECHR - Grant - Financial Audit - Public Procurement - Energy - Transport - Tax Law - Human Rights\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/articles\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"News | Christianos &amp; Partners - Law Firm\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"News | Christianos &amp; Partners | Lawyer - EU Law - OLAF - Competition - State Aid - ECJ-ECHR - Grant - Financial Audit - Public Procurement - Energy - Transport - Tax Law - Human Rights\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/articles\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Christianos &amp; Partners\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-11T10:05:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.christianos.eu\\\/en\\\/articles\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.christianos.eu\\\/en\\\/articles\\\/\",\"name\":\"News | Christianos & Partners - Law Firm\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.christianos.eu\\\/fr\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2018-03-29T13:48:02+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-11T10:05:40+00:00\",\"description\":\"News | Christianos & Partners | Lawyer - EU Law - OLAF - Competition - State Aid - ECJ-ECHR - Grant - Financial Audit - Public Procurement - Energy - Transport - Tax Law - Human Rights\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.christianos.eu\\\/en\\\/articles\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.christianos.eu\\\/en\\\/articles\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.christianos.eu\\\/en\\\/articles\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.christianos.eu\\\/en\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"News\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.christianos.eu\\\/fr\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.christianos.eu\\\/fr\\\/\",\"name\":\"Christianos & Partners\",\"description\":\"Law Firm\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.christianos.eu\\\/fr\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"News | Christianos & Partners - Law Firm","description":"News | Christianos & Partners | Lawyer - EU Law - OLAF - Competition - State Aid - ECJ-ECHR - Grant - Financial Audit - Public Procurement - Energy - Transport - Tax Law - Human Rights","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/articles\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"News | Christianos & Partners - Law Firm","og_description":"News | Christianos & Partners | Lawyer - EU Law - OLAF - Competition - State Aid - ECJ-ECHR - Grant - Financial Audit - Public Procurement - Energy - Transport - Tax Law - Human Rights","og_url":"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/articles\/","og_site_name":"Christianos & Partners","article_modified_time":"2018-10-11T10:05:40+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/articles\/","url":"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/articles\/","name":"News | Christianos & Partners - Law Firm","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/fr\/#website"},"datePublished":"2018-03-29T13:48:02+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-11T10:05:40+00:00","description":"News | Christianos & Partners | Lawyer - EU Law - OLAF - Competition - State Aid - ECJ-ECHR - Grant - Financial Audit - Public Procurement - Energy - Transport - Tax Law - Human Rights","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/articles\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/articles\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/articles\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"News"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/fr\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/fr\/","name":"Christianos & Partners","description":"Law Firm","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/fr\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/326","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=326"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/326\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":331,"href":"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/326\/revisions\/331"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.christianos.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=326"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}